ENGINEERS AS MANAGERS
1 Characteristics
The characteristics of engineers as managers are:
1. Promote an ethical climate, through framing organization policies,
responsibilities and by personal attitudes and obligations.
2. Resolving conflicts, by evolving priority, developing mutual
understanding, generating various alternative solutions to problems.
3. Social responsibility to stakeholders, customers and employers. They
act to develop wealth as well as the welfare of the society. Ethicists project
the view that the manager’s responsibility is only to increase the profit of
the organization, and only the engineers have the responsibility to protect the
safety, health, and welfare of the public.
But managers have the ethical responsibility to produce safe and good
products (or useful service), while showing respect for the human beings who
include the employees, customers and the public. Hence, the objective for the
managers and engineers is to produce valuable products that are also
profitable.
2 Managing Conflicts
In solving conflicts, force should not be resorted. In fact, the
conflict situations should be tolerated, understood, and resolved by
participation by all the concerned. The conflicts in case of project managers
arise in the following manners:
(a) Conflicts based on schedules: This happens because of various
levels of execution, priority and limitations of each level.
(b) Conflicts arising out of fixing the priority to different
projects or departments. This is to be arrived at from the end requirements and
it may change from time to time.
(c) Conflict based on the availability of personnel.
(d) Conflict over technical, economic, and time factors such as
cost, time, and performance level.
(e) Conflict arising in administration such as authority,
responsibility, accountability, and logistics required.
(f) Conflicts of personality, human psychology and ego problems.
(g) Conflict over expenditure and its deviations.
Most of the conflicts can be resolved by following the principles listed
here:
1. People
Separate people from the problem. It implies that the views of all
concerned should be obtained. The questions such as what, why, and when the
error was committed is more important than to know who committed it.
2. Interests
Focus must be only on interest i.e., the ethical attitudes or motives
and not on the positions (i.e., stated views). A supplier may require
commission larger than usual prevailing rate for an agricultural product. But
the past analysis may tell us that the material is not cultivated regularly and
the monsoon poses some additional risk towards the supply. Mutual interests
must be respected to a maximum level. What is right is more important than who
is right!
3. Options
Generate various options as solutions to the problem so that there is no
time lag in decision making. This helps a manager to try the next best solution
should the first one fails.
4. Evaluation
The evaluation of the results should be based on some specified
objectives such as efficiency, quality, and customer satisfaction. More
important is that the means, not only the goals, should be ethical.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
The consulting engineers work in private. There is no salary from the
employers. But they charge fees from the sponsor and they have more freedom to
decide on their projects. Still they have no absolute freedom, because they
need to earn for their living. The consulting engineers have ethical
responsibilities different from the salaried engineers, as follows:
1. Advertising
The consulting engineers are directly responsible for advertising their
services, even if they employ other consultants to assist them. But in many organizations,
this responsibility is with the advertising executives and the personnel
department.
They are allowed to advertise but to avoid deceptive ones. Deceptive
advertising such as the following are prohibited:
(a) By white lies.
(b) Half-truth, e.g., a product has actually been tested as
prototype, but it was claimed to have been already introduced in the market. An
architect shows the photograph of the completed building with flowering trees
around but actually the foundation of the building has been completed and there
is no real garden.
(c) Exaggerated claims. The consultant might have played a small
role in a well-known project.
But they could claim to have played a major role.
(d) Making false suggestions. The reduction in cost might have
been achieved along with the reduction in strength, but the strength details
are hidden.
(e) Through vague wordings or slogans.
2. Competitive Bidding
It means offering a price, and get something in return for the service
offered. The organizations have a pool of engineers. The expertise can be
shared and the bidding is made more realistic. But the individual consultants
have to develop creative designs and build their reputation steadily and
carefully, over a period of time. The clients will have to choose between the
reputed organizations and proven qualifications of the company and the
expertise of the consultants. Although competent, the younger consultants are
thus slightly at a disadvantage.
3. Contingency Fee
This is the fee or commission paid to the consultant, when one is
successful in saving the expenses for the client. A sense of honesty and
fairness is required in fixing this fee. The NSPE Code III 6 (a) says that
the engineers shall not propose or accept a commission on a contingent basis
where their judgment may be compromised.
The fee may be either as an agreed amount or a fixed percentage of the
savings realized. But in the contingency fee-agreements, the judgment of the
consultant may be biased. The consultant may be tempted to specify inferior
materials or design methods to cut the construction cost. This fee may motivate
the consultants to effect saving in the costs to the clients, through
reasonably moral and technological means.
4. Safety and Client’s Needs
The greater freedom for the consulting engineers in decision making on
safety aspects, and difficulties concerning truthfulness are the matters to be
given attention. For example, in design-only projects, the consulting engineers
may design something and have no role in the construction. Sometimes,
difficulties may crop-up during construction due to non-availability of
suitable materials, some shortcuts in construction, and lack of necessary and
adequate supervision and inspection. Properly-trained supervision is needed,
but may not happen, unless it is provided. Further, the contractor may not
understand and/or be willing to modify the original design to serve the clients
best.
A few on-site inspections by the consulting engineers will expose the
deficiency in execution and save the workers, the public, and the environment
that may be exposed to risk upon completion of the project. The NSPE codes on
the advertisement by consultants provide some specific regulations.
The following are the activities prohibited in advertisement by
consultant:
1. The use of statement containing misrepresentation or omission of a
necessary fact.
2. Statement intended or likely to create an unjustified expectation.
3. Statement containing prediction of future (probable) success.
4. Statement intended or likely to attract clients, by the use of
slogans or sensational language format.
ENGINEERS AS EXPERT WITNESS
Frequently engineers are required to act as consultants and provide
expert opinion and views in many legal cases of the past events. They are
required to explain the causes of accidents, malfunctions and other
technological behavior of structures, machines, and instruments, e.g., personal
injury while using an instrument, defective product, traffic accident,
structure or building collapse, and damage to the property, are some of the
cases where testimonies are needed. The focus is on the past.
The
functions of eye-witness and expert-witness are different as presented in the
Table below.
The engineers, who act as expert-witnesses, are likely to abuse their
positions in the following manners:
1. Hired Guns
Mostly lawyers hire engineers to serve the interest of their clients.
Lawyers are permitted and required to project the case in a way favorable to
their clients. But the engineers have obligations to thoroughly examine the
events and demonstrate their professional integrity to testify only the truth
in the court. They do not serve the clients of the lawyers directly. The hired
guns forward white lies and distortions, as demanded by the lawyers. They even
withhold the information or shade the fact, to favor their clients.
2. Money Bias
Consultants may be influenced or prejudiced for monitory considerations,
gain reputation and make a fortune.
3. Ego Bias
The assumption that the own side is innocent and the other side is
guilty, is responsible for this behavior. An inordinate desire to serve one’s
client and get name and fame is another reason for this bias.
4. Sympathy Bias
Sympathy for the victim on the opposite side may upset the testimony.
The integrity of the consultants will keep these biases away from the justice.
The court also must obtain the balanced view of both sides, by examining the
expert witnesses of lawyers on both sides, to remove a probable bias.
Duties
1. The expert-witness is required to exhibit the responsibility of confidentiality
just as they do in the consulting roles. They can not divulge the findings
of the investigation to the opposite side, unless it is required by the court
of law.
2. More important is that as witness they are not required to
volunteer evidence favorable to the opponent. They must answer questions
truthfully, need not elaborate, and remain neutral until the details are asked
for further.
3. They should be objective to discover the truth and communicate
them honestly.
4. The stand of the experts depends on the shared understanding created
within the society. The legal system should be respected and at the same time,
they should act in conformance with the professional standards as obtained from
the code of ethics.
5. The experts should earnestly be impartial in identifying and
interpreting the observed data, recorded data, and the industrial standards.
They should not distort the truth, even under pressure. Although they are hired
by the lawyers, they do not serve the lawyers or their clients. They serve the
justice. Many a time, their objective judgments will help the lawyer to put up
the best defense for their clients.
ENGINEERS AS ADVISORS IN PLANNING AND POLICY MAKING
Advisors
The engineers are required to give their view on the future such as in
planning, policy-making, which involves the technology. For example, should
India expand nuclear power options or support traditional energy sources such
as fossil fuels or alternative forms like solar and wind energy? In the recent
past, this topic has created lot of fireworks, in the national media.
Various issues and requirements for engineers who act as advisors are:
1. Objectivity
The engineers should study the cost and benefits of all possible
alternative means in objective manner, within the specified conditions and
assumptions.
2. Study All Aspects
They have to study the economic viability (effectiveness), technical
feasibility (efficiency), operational feasibility (skills) and social
acceptability, which include environmental and ethical aspects, before formulating
the policy.
3. Values
Engineers have to posses the qualities, such as (a) honesty, (b)
competence (skills and expertise), (c) diligence (careful and alert) (d)
loyalty in serving the interests of the clients and maintaining confidentiality,
and (e) public trust, and respect for the common good, rather than
serving only the interests of the clients or the political interests.
4. Technical Complexity
The arbitrary, unrealistic, and controversial assumptions made during
the future planning that are overlooked or not verified, will lead to moral
complexity. The study on future is full of uncertainties than the
investigations on the past events. On the study of energy options, for example,
assumptions on population increase, life style, urbanization, availability of
local fossil resources, projected costs of generating alternative forms of
energy, world political scenario, world military tensions and pressures from
world organizations such as World Trade Organization (W.T.O.) and European
Union (EU) may increase the complexity in judgment on future.
5. National Security
The proposed options should be aimed to strengthen the economy and
security of the nation, besides safeguarding the natural resources and the
environment from exploitation and degradation.
For the advisors on policy making or planning, a shared understanding on
balancing the conflicting responsibilities, both to the clients and to the
public, can be affected by the following roles or models:
1. Hired Gun
The prime obligation is shown to the clients. The data and facts
favorable to the clients are highlighted, and unfavorable aspects are hidden or
treated as insignificant. The minimal level of interest is shown for public
welfare.
2. Value-neutral Analysts
This assumes an impartial engineer. They exhibit conscientious
decisions, impartiality i.e., without bias, fear or favor, and absence of
advocacy.
3. Value-guided Advocates
The consulting engineers remain honest (frank in stating all the
relevant facts and truthful in interpretation of the facts) and autonomous
(independent) in judgment and show paramount importance to the public (as
different from the hired guns).
MORAL LEADERSHIP
Engineers provide many types of leadership in the development and implementation
of technology, as managers, entrepreneurs, consultants, academics and officials
of the government. Moral leadership is not merely the dominance by a group. It
means adopting reasonable means to motivate the groups to achieve morally
desirable goals. This leadership presents the engineers with many challenges to
their moral principles.
Moral leadership is essentially required for the engineers, for the
reasons listed as follows:
1. It is leading a group of people towards the achievement of global and
objectives. The goals as well as the means are to be moral. For example, Hitler
and Stalin were leaders, but only in an instrumental sense and certainly not on
moral sense.
2. The leadership shall direct and motivate the group to move through
morally desirable ways.
3. They lead by thinking ahead in time, and morally creative towards new
applications, extension and putting values into practice. ‘Morally creative’
means the identification of the most important values as applicable to the
situation, bringing clarity within the groups through proper communication, and
putting those values into practice.
4. They sustain professional interest, among social diversity and
cross-disciplinary complexity. They contribute to the professional societies,
their professions, and to their communities. The moral leadership in
engineering is manifested in leadership within the professional societies. The
professional societies provide a forum for communication, and canvassing for change
within and by groups.
5. Voluntarism: Another important avenue for providing moral
leadership within communities, by the engineers is to promote services without
fee or at reduced fees (pro bono) to the needy groups. The professional
societies can also promote such activities among the engineers.
This type of voluntarism (or philanthropy) has been in practice in the
fields of medicine, law and education. But many of the engineers are not
self-employed as in the case of physicians and lawyers. The business
institutions are encouraged to contribute a percentage of their services as
free or at concessional rates for charitable purposes.
6. Community service: This is another platform for the engineers
to exhibit their moral leadership.
The engineers can help in guiding, organizing, and stimulating the
community toward morally- and environmentally-desirable goals. The corporate
organizations have come forward to adopt villages and execute many social
welfare schemes, towards this objective.
The Codes of Ethics promote and sustain the ethical environment and
assist in achieving the ethical goals in the following manner:
1. It creates an environment in a profession, where ethical behavior is
the basic criterion.
2. It guides and reminds the person as to how to act, in any given
situation.
3. It provides support to the individual, who is being pressurized or
tortured by a superior or employer, to behave unethically.
4. Apart from professional societies, companies and universities have
framed their own codes of ethics, based on the individual circumstances and
specific mission of the organizations.
These codes of conduct help in employees’ awareness of ethical issues,
establish, and nurture a strong corporate ethical culture.
Very informative and impressive post you have written, this is quite interesting and i have went through it completely, an upgraded information is shared, keep sharing such valuable information. Value Engineering Expert
ReplyDelete